\begin{table}[!h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{rllll}
  \hline
 & Beta coefficients for treatment & Interval &  & Multiplicative effect \\ 
  \hline
Protection of predators & -0.01 & (-0.43- 0.39) &  & -1.4\% \\ 
  Construction of buildings &  0.11 & (-0.18- 0.41) &  & 11\% \\ 
  Moratorium gen. plants & -0.36 & (-0.76- 0.02) &  & -30\% \\ 
  Animal-friendly care &  0.04 & (-0.27- 0.33) &  & 3.7\% \\ 
  Extenstion of CO2 charge & -0.07 & (-0.40- 0.27) &  & -6.8\% \\ 
  Renounce fossil use 2050 & -0.28 & (-0.61- 0.03) &  & -24\% \\ 
  Six lanes for motorways & -0.18 & (-0.55- 0.15) &  & -17\% \\ 
  Subsidies for all farmers &  0.27 & (-0.13- 0.68) & (+) & 30\% \\ 
  Minimum wage of 4000CHF & -0.52 & (-0.87--0.22) & (-) & -41\% \\ 
  Opening hours of retailers &  0.14 & (-0.18- 0.46) &  & 15\% \\ 
  Raising retirement age to 67 &  0.09 & (-0.20- 0.38) &  & 9.7\% \\ 
  Financial support childcare & -0.18 & (-0.49- 0.13) &  & -17\% \\ 
  Regulation of immigration &  0.00 & (-0.27- 0.26) &  & -0.12\% \\ 
  Income dep. health insurance & -0.21 & (-0.46- 0.04) &  & -19\% \\ 
  Money for Swiss military & -0.20 & (-0.54- 0.12) &  & -18\% \\ 
  Legalize Cannabis &  0.03 & (-0.34- 0.39) &  & 2.7\% \\ 
  Average & -0.085 &  &  & -8.1\% \\ 
   \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Coefficient estimates for variation in importance given a righ-wing political orientation. Coefficients
significantly higher than or lower than the average coefficient for the treatment variable across all issues are marked
with (+) or (-), respectively. The multiplicative effect is the natural exponent of the beta coefficient, indicating the impact of being treated on the disutility weight attached to voter-candidate disagreements.} 
\end{table}
